Author
|
Topic: Give this a try...
|
Sheaa Olein unregistered
|
posted August 07, 2006 06:21 PM
Wow!! How'd I miss this thread, it's trully incredible .... where is Yivy? Did she/he become another named knowflake/moderator? ------------------ "There is no remedy for love but to love more." Henry David Thoreau IP: Logged |
silverstone unregistered
|
posted August 08, 2006 02:55 AM
I can't believe I missed this too! This is Awwwwwwwwesome Cheers, Silverstone IP: Logged |
Emeraldopal Knowflake Posts: 696 From: U Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted October 09, 2011 12:15 AM
Yes, AWesomeness!------------------ All my love, with all my Heart lotusheartone IP: Logged |
LEXX Moderator Posts: 7833 From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 09, 2011 10:31 AM
Interesting concepts but why folks cannot or do not want to see/tell the difference betwixt actual Lexigramming and Lexigram based readings, or as I have coined them; FLEXIGRAMS. Why want a creation with basically false information inserted rendering the creations as not being actual Lexigrams? It is akin to reading an Astrological chart and inserting false information, or a tarot reading with made up things not actually found from the cards laid out. Again I will state; I do not mind folks having fun; but to call a thing a Lexigram when it is not; is a kind of slap in the face to anyone creating the real thing. Yes I find it rather disturbing that non Lexigrams are being viewed in same league as my (or anyone's)error free works which are actual 100% Lexigrams no cheating by adding what is not there to add.
IP: Logged |
Starry, Starry Night Knowflake Posts: 68 From: Springvale South, Victoria, Australia Registered: Sep 2011
|
posted October 13, 2011 07:23 AM
Dear Lexx please could you give us the rules for lexigrams even if you have to repeat yourself again as I do not understand. Also are your rules the same as Linda Goodman's I am sure everyone here respects your work. You've had a head start on many of us here. Please do not stop your good work its marvellous.IP: Logged |
LEXX Moderator Posts: 7833 From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 13, 2011 11:05 AM
quote: Originally posted by Starry, Starry Night: Dear Lexx please could you give us the rules for lexigrams even if you have to repeat yourself again as I do not understand. Also are your rules the same as Linda Goodman's I am sure everyone here respects your work. You've had a head start on many of us here. Please do not stop your good work its marvellous.
Thank you for the compliments and for your sincere interest in Lexigrams/Lexigramming! Please bear with me; had another bad night and not clear headed at moment. I shall return to answer any more questions you may have, as soon as possible! A short answer is no, my rules, which are the ancient rules for basic Lexigraming are not exactly the same as Linda's. The ancient rules I use are in essence much simpler and logical. http://lexigramhistory.blogspot.com/2008/04/short-history-of-lexigramming-and.html 1. Whatever letters you can get from the source you are Lexigramming, both consonants and vowels, use them as you desire, but only in the amounts you have!2. Do NOT add any letters/consonants and vowels you do not have. 3. Do NOT remove any letters, consonants or vowels. That is it basically it for general Lexigramming. Very Simple! Forget about Zebra rules. Forget about negative words. It is NOT the bad thing Linda said of them. http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001635.html Advanced Lexigramming such as Relationship and Compatibility Lexigramming is much more complex. Please ask me any question about Lexigramming and I will reply. I have a thread specifically for questions to make it easier for folks to find answers on one thread. Please post your questions there! http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/002007.html IP: Logged |