|
Author
|
Topic: Does NO always mean NO?
|
NosiS
Knowflake Posts: 3
From: Miami, FL, USA
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted April 12, 2004 02:19 PM
 
Hello all. This topic is somewhat similar to the last one, but I have a more specific question. I am aware that if the word 'NO' or 'NOT' appears in a Lexigram it may cancel any negative words appearing in the subject being lexigrammed and that a "person (or word) is guilty only when the word YES appears in the Lexigram without the cancel power of the words NO or NOT." [Star Signs]
The only query I have with this is that Linda does not specify any Lexigrams with the words YES and NO. I would assume that if a word or phrase contains both a YES and at least one of the "cancel" words, NO and/or NOT, then the "cancel" words have the ability to negate a negative word or phrase, even with the YES.
I read the latest topic here before I typed this and I like the explanations giving the subject being lexigrammed a choice between either polarity, but what i cannot seem to ken clearly is if Linda revealed where the leverage is between the dual appearance of a YES and NO. Will the subject be accused and if so, is it guilty or innocent? Does the YES have more weight or the NO?Peace be with us IP: Logged |
Aselzion
Moderator Posts: 857
From: Peabody, MA USA
Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted April 12, 2004 02:55 PM
Greetings...I say this is almost exactly like the last question, and the answer is the same.  It will be what the individual or entity chooses it to be. Or it will be what we perceive it to be. I haven't seen this circumstance yet, but I believe that if something said both YES and NO, then it would be up to the entity to decide which path it was to choose. Actually it is ALWAYS up to the entity. After all, we create our own reality. Besides, I don't think that Lexigrams were meant to answer all the questions for us.. but merely to provide a stepping off point where we begin to spiral and grow and evolve. As we soar to the heights on the wings of the Lexigram, we become open to possibilities, and we learn that there is a great deal of fluidity in the Universe. Isn't that the point? In the Light...
A  P.S. Perhaps you can offer an example of where this is the case and we can all have a go at interpreting it? But please, do not give me a jumble of letters and ask me to Lexigram it. If I do not have my original word or phrase, then I do not bother. That is NOT how Linda did her Lexigrams, nor is it how I think they should be done. My opinion only. ------------------
"The ALL is MIND; the Universe is Mental." *** The Kybalion IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 16837
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted April 12, 2004 09:25 PM
Welcome!  ------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark IP: Logged |
NosiS
Knowflake Posts: 3
From: Miami, FL, USA
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted April 13, 2004 01:42 AM
Good point, Aselzion. The focus should definitely be on what the Lexigram reveals about the subject and what kinds of choices it has.
I suppose that I became transfixed on that paragraph in the Lexigram chapter in which Linda states that a person or word is guilty of negative words or phrases in their lexigramming only if the letters forming YES appear while the letters forming NO or NOT are absent. With your insight though, I realize that a choice is still to be made and that there is just an inclination, be it strong or weak, towards a certain pole. Therefore, wisdom is present in the act of changing one's name to a better vibration just so that there doesn't have to be an unnecessary amount of effort due to the constant influence of the negative vibration.
Just writing down my thoughts for the sake of communicating an understanding.
Thank Yuo for your insight!P.S. One example of the situation I mentioned before would be a person's name such as S H E Y L A S T O N E . IP: Logged |
Aselzion
Moderator Posts: 857
From: Peabody, MA USA
Registered: Nov 2002
|
posted April 13, 2004 03:36 AM
Greetings...I see the letters you speak of in that Lexigram. Here I am forced to tell you that unless a person has received a good deal of notoriety, positive or negative, I seldom ever do personal name Lexigrams. As not every human being achieves fame, I do not believe that every single Lexigram leads to enlightenment. And as I said before I NEVER consider one that is put forth as a mere jumble of alphabet soup. That is a phenomenon I found peculiar to this site (as it is the only Linda site I frequent) and I find it leaves me cold and uninspired. I assume people do it to protect privacy, but in that case I say do not ask for a Lexigram. MY OPINION. And I have seeen posts where people left a jumble of alphabet soup where they later come back and say they left out a letter or added too many of another... so why should I waste what little free time I have trying to Lexigram incorrect names? Again, simply my opinion. And as I always mention, that is NOT how Linda worked them, nor how she taught them in Star Signs. As I (generally) do not read cards or look at my chart before I make any decision, I do not Lexigram a name unless I feel that there might be some insight to gain by the exercise. I have not Lexigrammed my own name. Like reading the cards or charts, I feel that one lacks a certain objectivity in that arena. If you are in a good mood, and you see something good.. then the Ego is likely to swell the head. Conversely if you are in a blue mood and the Lexigram says something distatsteful, you might be inclined to obsess about that. I'm much more interested in Lexigrams such as: ISRAEL, THE GREAT PYRAMID, THE CRYSTAL SKULL, EARTH/HEART, STONEHENGE, THE ROSICRUCIANS and other such enticing words or phrases. But to each his or her own. In the Light...
A ------------------
"The ALL is MIND; the Universe is Mental." *** The Kybalion IP: Logged |
Eleanore
Knowflake Posts: 240
From: North Carolina
Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted April 14, 2004 02:24 PM
Hello NosiS
How are you? How are the palms in Miami?  Here's a quote from Star Signs: "The person (or word) is guilty only when the word YES appears in the Lexigram without the cancel power of the words NO or NOT." The whole section (trade paperback pg 334-335) is a little confusing but if you reread it a few times you should be able to understand what Linda meant to say. She gave many different rules for different instances, one right after the other, so be patient. 
I believe intention is very important in everything. I also believe that no one system is going to given anyone all the answers ... astrology, numerology, lexigrams, etc. these are all codes to be used together to help point you in the right/true direction. But I also think that the rules that are set up for a particular system have a great deal of validity. It would be very easy for someone whose name, when lexigrammed, revealed that they possessed negative traits to ignore them or deny them based on their choice to assume or perceive that revelation how ever they wished to. I'm not saying that everybody does that, but if there weren't rules like the Zebra rule then it would be quite easy to do without a guilty conscience. Of course, everyone, I think, should be inclined to test out any system they wish to practice and really observe whether or not those rules work for them. If not, then keep searching for another system. That may sound like a rude opinion, and I'm sorry for that, but it's just my little opinion so please don't be offended.
Also, I agree with Aselzion about the jumble letter lexigrams ... it's that much harder to try to tune into to a word/entity/name when you don't know what it is. IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
