Author
|
Topic: This should have been private!
|
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 9809 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat. fayte1954@hotmail.com Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 05:55 PM
See lies here from LibraSparkle: http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001440.html She slandered us and lied about us. $20 a word???? And more lies. Slander is illegal. Disagreeing how to Lexigram is not. Ethics are really screwed up around here.If anyone here..especially moderators had a problem with me...you should have e-mailed me! I said it before in posts! I would leave if I was not wanted! Yet each time I asked...I was told it was ok....I would have respected you and stopped. But this should have been done privately! IF RANDALL HAD A PROBLEM WITH MY POSTING A LINK, I THINK RANDALL WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING. THANKS FOR THE GREAT BANNER OFFER RANDALL. I WILL HOLD OFF FOR NOW BECAUSE FOLKS DO NOT SEEM TO REALLY BE INTERESTED, ONLY WANT TO BASH WHAT THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE BASHING. MANY FOLKS ADVERTISE HERE AT LL! I WAS OFFERING FREEBIES AND HELP... BUT NO ONE BOTHERED TO TAKE THE TIME TO LOOK INTO MY OFFERS AND FIND OUT WHAT i WAS GIVING AWAY!
IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 5322 From: Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 06:08 PM
Fayte~ My response, which you outlined in another thread, was after you said "I do not use Linda Goodman's system of lexigramming, If you'd like to learn more about the system I use, go to ___inneryou website___"My problem is not in your lexigramming, it is in the interest of Linda-goodman.com. Which is what I said. That is not 'private'.. My response to you was a disclaimer, to say to the original poster of the thread, that not all feel this way. Linda Used the version of lexigramming fully explained, and if you have read StarSigns, she goes into it with great detail. My offense was about that. You are advertising on LL, and a bit of that isn't so bad... but it does seem ever more frequent,... and when you say point blank.. "This is not the way, come over here".. it is recruitment to serve your needs, not to help others. My problem is not with you... I think you know that. Nor is it a private matter. I have never indicated I wanted you to leave... why on Earth would I wish that? I believe I was clear in my intent. I am sorry you feel the way you do.
IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 5322 From: Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 06:46 PM
Oh.. and how is the whole "This should have been private" even applicable when you yourself post all over the entire forum an non objective, finger pointing woe is me post?Obviously you have no issues with being private. IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 9809 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat. fayte1954@hotmail.com Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 06:55 PM
It was too late for privacy...and I was only trying to help..... I was honest...I never meant to say do not do it her way! I believe I just said there are other ways! But I have become tired of defending my way....I had to do it so much and explain so many times that it appeared as if I was attacking Linda's way! THAT was NOT my intention! But when folks wanted things lexigrammed that can not be under Linda's way...well what else was I supposed to do? Let them go on thinking there was no other way? That they are allowed and able to have their names done....that is all I wanted to say....just maybe not by Linda's rules. I do not see the harm in that. I also asked many times if I should leave....no one said to...I just do not get it. I was just giving people options!
Yes..this is an added! Ms.Pix bumped this issue up in Astral Realms. I will not re-post at the other places as I did with my goodbyes..there at AR, finally forced into replying...to put an end to this nonsense. But I had not realized that some more was being made up about things...such as: Quote:Pix: You said ( paraphrased) "I do not agree with Linda Goodman's lexigramming, If you want to see that way we do it, come to ___Inner you website___"
Severely paraphrased! I NEVER said THAT! For those that wish...see the page at Astral Realms...I am done defending myself! This is not worth my time! PS. As to my not doing them Linda's way? Well...some of the things she said are simply untrue and I can prove it by examples. I am not going against Linda, but she was in error and because I can prove it, I am bad????? Linda was wrong here because: 1. Any name can be Lexigrammed. 2. There is no need to drop any vowels or consonants, you will NOT get most every word in a dictionary! The complete alphabet does not even have a dictionary worth number of words within it. 3. Lexigramming can be done in any language, NOT just English! 4. There is no such thing as a name, phrase, etcetera not "wanting" to be Lexigrammed. 5. No means no, yes means yes...no mystery or "zebras" there. 6. Never add or remove any letters before or during or after creating a Lexigram. 7. There is no length limit. Additionally Linda did not invent Lexigrams nor the word. Lexigrams have been around for thousands of years. Lexigram was/is a word first used by those in ape/primate language studies. Most of Linda's Lexigrams have errors and she hid added words and letters. Pointing out the obvious and being able to prove my statements is not meant to dishonour Linda. She was not a Lexigram master. Sorry that upsets her fans. I love her Sun Signs and Love Signs.
IP: Logged |
Tranquil Poet Knowflake Posts: 1360 From: New York City Registered: Apr 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 07:07 PM
Stay fayte
IP: Logged |
pixelpixie Knowflake Posts: 5322 From: Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted June 27, 2005 07:08 PM
*Hugs for Fayte. I think this whole thing has gotten terribly big.... when it wasn't intended to be.I am now actually moderating * I wanted to just slack off, and post sillies today...* so I won't thank you for that.. but I do wish you the best, and I hope this will be quickly put in the past. I know you mean well.. as evidenced in other forums ( well, except for that last bit... .) UNderstand, I have never had anything personal against you or your motives. I have made myself clear I believe. BUt right now, this is a little much. IP: Logged | |