Author
|
Topic: Computers destroying Magic
|
peajie unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 03:48 AM
The Magic of Lexigrams has two faces.1, The wonder and mystery how words contain hidden messages. Which brings the realisation that they are "ALIVE" . And it is not just a dry bible quote when it says "in the beginning was the Word". 2, The active psychic activity which take place in the nuerological processes of the Mind when hunting words for hidden content. Unfortunately now we do not need to do this. Just enter a word into a computer program and it will list every available word for you. So sad. As we watch things Organic, and psychic being replaced by dry mecanical and scientific processes. Very much like using a book to interpret cards which are drawn, instead of developing ones own ability to interpret subliminal messages from our contact with a person. IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 09:34 AM
IP: Logged |
peajie unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 10:54 AM
Good One Fayte.You did not disagree. You helped establish the meaning of a Lexigram. Ofcourse I was speaking of "Cheaters" who talk of Lexigrams unaware of the real magic which creates them. Just like the people who call themselves "readers" when all they read is a guide book with somebody elses pre-stated interpretations. IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 11:14 AM
IP: Logged |
lotusheartone unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 11:28 AM
You both make perfectly good sense to me.it's the magic, creating have you ever lexigrammed George W, Bush, with his full middle name, don't do it here, a moderator removed my reply and hers, this happened months ago, and it was in Global Unity. it's very interesting. Love and Light to ALL
IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 11:37 AM
IP: Logged |
lotusheartone unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 11:43 AM
now you've gone from greed to lust, LOL where is the one we can trust? IP: Logged |
Iqhunk unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 12:26 PM
I have never used an Anagram generator. My mind is faster LOL!IP: Logged |
Iqhunk unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 12:32 PM
George Walker Bush GULAG USA WAGE SHARK BORG GAOLS LURK GARBAGE LURKER WREAKS USAOk, I dont wanna proceed, I get the picture.
IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 01:53 PM
So...when are you going to come play the spiral game? IP: Logged |
Iqhunk unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 02:31 PM
Hi Fayte, Right now I am enjoying reading the Spiral Game I have a lot more Lexis to try out on individual words too, since there is so much knowledge to glean. Meanwhile, whats your take on syllables or sound based lexis? Example, if Teech were an english word pronounced as Teach, would it be ok to take "Cheat" as being a lexigram from Teech, since uttered sound is the true vibration ?IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 12, 2005 08:44 PM
IP: Logged |
Iqhunk unregistered
|
posted November 13, 2005 08:12 AM
Hi Fayte, I am awaiting your system IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 13, 2005 09:34 AM
Not sure what you mean by my "SYSTEM"?
IP: Logged |
SunChild unregistered
|
posted November 15, 2005 01:32 AM
Peajie. Anything quick and easy always makes me wonder? hmmm... And yesss I do agree with you. I don't lexi all that often but when I do I never use a word generator. I stare at the list of letters and begin to automatically list the words that jump out. I follow intuitively. Then I construct sentences. If I miss some words, then so be it! Using a generator to get a list, and a list only is NOT a sin in my book, I just don't do it. I use the words that are found by my own discovery. I just like it that way. And I don't mind if others use a tool for gathering words... ...But it would be quite sad if you used actual anagrams. What fun would be in lexigramming if you use anagram sentences? It wouldn't make sense! Who would do that? I hope i'm not that naive, I haven't really noticed anyone doing it here. I don't mind what others do really, each to their own. Personally, I'm quite organic as well. I don't normally add letters, or anything like that. If it's an accident, well that's another story! A good example of a great lexigrammer is YIVY...she is a Lexi Goddess...I've always felt it was pure of heart. I wonder where she is? IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 15, 2005 01:32 PM
While I have not checked all the lexigrams here at LL I have noticed quite a few with errors. One should double check their work. But alas, I noticed even Linda has errors in some of hers in Star Signs. I wonder why she left the errors? edit to add: quote: A good example of a great lexigrammer is YIVY.
She has a few good ones. But many have several to dozens of errors. It seems everyone is afraid to say that, just like saying Linda has many errors in hers too. And many here do use the generators and it is obvious.
IP: Logged |
SunChild unregistered
|
posted November 15, 2005 11:55 PM
Actually Fayte, I think we have the SAME point, just a different way of putting it. I just didnt' compose my post very well. I was talking about 'quick and easy' in the context of using an anagram generator to quick and easily spill out a few lines...then in my mind I would be going "hmmm"..as in 'not so good.' No matter what my personal opinion is... I would NEVER indicate it is a sin to do otherwise, I thought I made that rather clear. quote: Using a generator to get a list, and a list only ,is NOT a sin in my book
MEANING: if you use it to get a LIST...okay, fine!! Good! If you use it to get sentences...well, now you're not using your brain or inutition now are you? Get the difference of what I was really trying to say? I agree with you fully fayte...hope you can see that.
IP: Logged |
fayte.m unregistered
|
posted November 16, 2005 10:19 AM
SunChild quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using a generator to get a list, and a list only ,is NOT a sin in my book --------------------------------------------------------------------------------MEANING: if you use it to get a LIST...okay, fine!! Good! THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING!!!!!! YES! Snatching random snippets of ridiculous(usually!) lines out of anagram generators is not lexigramming! That is something any fool can do! Good...I see we agree that the actual creating of the lexigram itself is a thing to take most seriously and apply all our intuition, insight, and whatever other spiritual means we use to create them.... It is not all about grammer or just making sentences. It must mean more than that!
I finally took a look at the anagram generators you all have been talking about and thinking I used, (but had never heard of such til you all told me).... I had never heard of such a thing before! Except for them being free...I see no other redeeming thing about them, except as use for idle amusement. The time it would take to rake through all the crap those things spill out... I have been Lexigramming for nearly 1/2 a century and all that time, decades LONG BEFORE COMPUTERS; and long before I joined here and finally got on a computer in just March of this year. So seriously; did not know about Anagram generators nor use them. IP: Logged |