posted May 18, 2007 10:09 AM              

Also, you can only lexigram in English, due to complex reasons concerning the English language's unique status, which can be traced back to millenia ago.

Here's the evidence:

Book title: Healing Depression & Bipolar Disorder Without Drugs

Author: Gracelyn Guyol (By the way, I think this book sucks)

ISBN-10: 080271496X
ISBN-13: 978-0802714961

HEALING DEPRESSION & BIPOLAR DISORDER WITHOUT DRUGS

A, e, i, o, u are all present.

THIS IS TRUE; THIS IS NOT TRUE; THIS IS UNTRUE; THIS IS SO TRUE; THIS IS SO UNTRUE; THIS IS GOOD; THIS IS BAD; THIS IS NO GOOD; THIS IS NO BAD...

Book title: The Pet Lover's Guide to Natural Healing for Cats & Dogs (I hate this book)

Author: Barbara Fougere
ISBN-10: 1416029869
ISBN-13: 978-1416029861

THE PET LOVER'S GUIDE TO NATURAL HEALING FOR CATS & DOGS

A, e, i, o, u are all present.

THIS IS TRUE; THIS IS NOT TRUE; THIS IS UNTRUE; THIS IS NOT UNTRUE; THIS IS ALL GOOD; THIS IS ALL EVIL; THIS IS NO GOOD; THIS IS NOT EVIL...

ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY

A, e, i, o, u are all present.

THIS SHALL HEAL THE ILL; THIS SHALL NEVER HEAL THE ILL; NO, THIS SHALL NOT HEAL THE ILL; YES, THIS SHALL HEAL THE ILL...

Here lexigram comes to the junction with numerology. When we see words, we don't merely see lexigrams; we see the numerological vibrations in the words as well. There is a meaning why all 5 vowels present meaning the entity is not to be lexigrammed; there is a meaning why over15 separated and/or different alphabets present in the same entity means it does not want to be lexigrammed.

Only English can be used for lexigrams.

MEAT

Its French counterpart (translation): AVIANDE/L'AVIANDE

While MEAT would be lexigrammed as the following:

EAT ME; EAT A MATE; A MATE ATE ME; MET A MATE, ATE A MATE; A MATE MET ME, ATE ME

Its French word, AVIANDE/L'AVIANDE would not lead to the same results in French at all.

In French, if you want words with identical meanings, it would be something like (I can't type the accents, sorry):

MANGEZ MOI/MANGES MOI/MANGEONS MOI; UN COPAIN/UNE COPINE M'A MANGE; J'AI RENCONTRE UN COPAIN/UNE COPINE, A MANGE MON/UN COPAIN/MA/UNE COPINE; UN COPAIN/UNE COPINE M'A RENCONTRE, M'A MANGE

Which you would never get from the word/s "AVIANDE/L'AVIANDE".

French: APRES-COUP

Its standard English translation is DEFERRED ACTION

While its original German word is NACHTRAGLICHKEIT. (unable to type the accent, sorry)

English: EAT
French: MANGER
German: ESSEN

English: ZLATA'S DIARY
French: LE JOURNAL DE ZLATA

English: PARIS, I LOVE YOU
French: PARIS, JE T'AIME

French:L'AMANT
English: THE LOVER

French: L'AMANT DE LA CHINE DU NORT
English: THE LOVER FROM THE NORTH OF CHINA

Lake

posted May 18, 2007 08:34 PM              

Thanks for the feedback.

My thoughts would be...I am forever learning, I will never graduate from this school of human evolution, and I should not want to, because I see no point in that so I will never want to graduate from this school, unless I have reached my next level. Therefore, I am forever learning, I will encourage myself to be as open as possible to new experiences, to new concepts, to different ideologies from other people; I will encourage myself to be open to all possibilities, instead of rejecting any notions that seem to be in opposition to my own; I will remind myself that when it comes to which languages can be used for lexigrams, I have merely begun my journey of learning, and I should be humble when it comes to valuable opinions from others who are more experienced than I, and whose wisdom I admire, and should not take for granted.

These are my thoughts.

posted May 21, 2007 08:01 AM            

As for the english language thing, I'm still not sure because I don't speak any other language so I can't test it out.

posted May 21, 2007 08:18 AM              

Thanks! Well, it wasn't really my own "attempt" to challenge the unchallengeable...it was my attempt to prove that some people (or just one person, or two, or three, mmm) who have been claiming they can lexigram everything- are WRONG.

I was trying to prove that such blasphamy toward lexigrams is simply ludicrous. And thank God I proved it.

By the way, I haven't posted anything to your threads, but I've always been wanting to say congrats and all the blessings with your baby in progress! Well, I hope I've put it the right way

posted May 21, 2007 08:25 AM              

quote:

---

Thanks! Well, it wasn't really my own "attempt" to challenge the unchallengeable...it was my attempt to prove that some people (or just one person, or two, or three, mmm) who have been claiming they can lexigram everything- are WRONG.

I was trying to prove that such blasphamy toward lexigrams is simply ludicrous. And thank God I proved it.

---

posted May 21, 2007 11:38 AM            

Fayte, email received and appreciated, thanks!

Since my last post I did witness a Lexi that broke Lindas' rules and turned out well. So I guess the possibilites are endless, and I don't believe anyone is wrong just for exploring the possibilities.

I was just thinking, what if we found just as many lexis that turned out awesome as there are nonsense ones? how will the evidence stack up then? It's up to the individual to decide I guess and how they perceive a certain lexi.

I don't think this is something that can ultimately be proven one way or another.

posted May 22, 2007 07:33 AM              

We might find it difficult to prove anything; but time will tell, and time will prove something.

posted November 26, 2007 08:47 PM              

I have an interesting experiment for you if you're game?

posted November 27, 2007 05:00 PM              

Goldilocks
and the Three Bears

Thirty-Eighth President,
Gerald Rudolph Ford, Junior

Napoleone di Buonaparte
The First

President Abraham Lincoln

posted November 27, 2007 05:49 PM              

quote:

---

Just playing Devil's Advocate, but just because a Lexigram appears to work out, does that mean it really worked? I mean, since you could get a large number of different words and phrases out of it, the Lexigramer could unintentionally make such a Lexigram say what the Lexigramer wants it to say (sabatoging the results).

---

So aside from the "hiding" of added letters, by not setting them off, one is also adding meaning to a Lexigram which is simply not there. That is a false reading, no matter how one attempts to justify it.
"One can Force a Lexigram to say whatever one desires it to say, by adding letters not found in the name or original word etcetera, being Lexigrammed. But that negates the validity and truth of it."
I personally find that unethical to do to anyone I do Lexigramming for.
So add all you want, if that is your thing. But please be fair, and honest, and set the added letters off properly as Linda said to do.
This way, the person the Lexigram is for, knows at a glance, where the most validity and weight of truth is. They can worry less about, or not take as seriously then, any of the added words.

posted November 27, 2007 06:15 PM              

For example:
(yes, I know this is an anagram..but it will serve for now)
AVE MARIA, GRATIA PLENA, DOMINUS TECUM
(“Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee.”

can be anagrammed to become

VIRGO SERENA, PIA, MUNDA ET IMMACULATA
“Virgin serene, holy, pure, and immaculate.”

Notice that the phrase is a Perfect Anagram in Latin only. When translated into the English, we can see the meanings are similar, but there is no longer an anagrammatical relationship.

Here is another:
A famous Latin anagram was an answer made out of a question asked by Pilate. The question was: "QUID EST VERITAS?" (What is the truth?), and the answer: "EST VIR QUI ADEST" (it is the man who stands before you).

I am currently trying to learn non Engish alphabets to Lexigram in other languages not just those based on the English alphabet.
I really do not see what the problem is.
Anything written or spoken or heard by our ears is Lexigrammable!
Even the wind's sounds or your cat's meows.

posted January 15, 2008 09:32 AM              

quote:

---

I guess if it has less vowels, the meaning is a lot clearer and simpler, therefore, easier to prove.

---

posted March 06, 2008 07:33 PM            

quote:

---

Not that you have to actually remove any letters from what you want to lexigram. I'm just saying that the shorter the word, the easier it is to find what you're looking for, and there is less chance of you getting something false.
Like lexigrams of a single word.

---