Author
|
Topic: Venus Retro has me insecure I guess, please help with lexigram.
|
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 01, 2007 06:40 AM
My Lexigram. And a guy's lexigram.Now, I have tried to do them and it got a little, no very, confusing especially in the union/compatibility/relationship part. Even with the individual ones, I couldn't decide which statement was true because of the word "no" present. Help before Venus Retro has me slitting my wrist, but you don't have to rush - when you get the time. Me: A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z Him: A E H II LL M N O S T W If dates of birth give insight: me: 13/09/1982 him: 7/01/1985 Yeah, he is younger. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher paved the way. Thank you in advance. Unmoved. IP: Logged |
Eleanore Moderator Posts: 2224 From: Japan Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted August 02, 2007 09:16 AM
I did single lexigrams for you and and him. I'm very bad at relationship lexis but am working on it. Hopefully someone else can lend you a hand with that part. ******
You: A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z I LIVE ALONE A LONE ROAD I RIDE LEAD I ... EDEN POWER IN I NO WAR, NO PAIN NO POOR, WORN ONE IN LINE A PRINCE! NO EVIL NO LIE I PREVIEW A WEIRD, WIRED ZONE LEAD A NEW LAND DOWN? NO! EVEN DONE A PAIR NOW RIDE A WIDER ROAD WE WON WE ARE ONE ****** Him: A E H II LL M N O S T W I WAIT I WANT HEAT I WANT TO HEAL WASH IT ALL A LOW MOAN NOT TO WHINE LISTEN TO ME IT IS NOT LATE IT IS NOT LOST NO HELL AT LAST WE TWO WILL MELT AS ONE TIME IS STOLEN WE WILL WANT NOT IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 02, 2007 09:47 AM
Thank you very much Eleanore. It is very refreshing to read it from someone else's filter. I'll try some of my own too, even though I am useless at it. Thank you. IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 04, 2007 01:27 AM
Unmoved I replied to you a bit at the other thread. Also you made me smile quote: Yeah, he is younger. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher paved the way.
I am almost 15 years older than my husband. I think it is becoming less strange for folks to consider older women with younger men. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 04, 2007 06:40 AM
Fayte.mI resisted for some time, dating younger guys, because it was "not proper" or something, I can't rememeber why... Then I woke up one day and realised that I was being stupid. Look at you, for example. You have a husband, he is younger, and if you thought like me (back in the days), you wouldn't have had the opportunity to get to know him. Besides... these young boys are hot, and surprisingly mature. It was good to know about you and you hubby's age difference. It just proves that people are people, and judging them with their age (amongst other things is soooooo useless, pointless. Very cool fayte.m! IP: Logged |
MAG Knowflake Posts: 75 From: UK Registered: Jul 2007
|
posted August 04, 2007 06:44 AM
Hi FAYTE!! Oh yeah? 15 years older than your partner? Wow thats cool!! in my case things are in the opposite way!! hehe Regards
IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 04, 2007 10:12 AM
My monitor is fritzing out. Talk to you lovely ladies later!------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 04, 2007 08:13 PM
Got another monitor. Will return as soon as I can. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 12:31 AM
Based on Eleanore's two individual person's Lexigrams... Words they share in common=Compatibility:A ALONE I IN LIE LINE LONE LOW NEW NO NOW WE WON There are no Union words in the two Lexigrams. So to continue, I will illustrate using number related words valid to the 4 different types of Lexigrams. Examples of Single person/individual number words: Unique to him; A E H II LL M N O S T W : MILLION MILLIONTH TEN TWO Unique to her; A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z: NINE Examples of Compatability number words...words they share, and as individuals: ONE Examples of number words that can only be created by them together, not as in common nor as individuals...ie; only as a Union. ELEVEN ELEVENTH NINETEEN NINTH SEVEN SEVENTH THIRD THREE TWELVE By combining your Compatibility words with your Union words; you acquire words to use to create a Compatibility/Union Lexigram: ONE ELEVEN ELEVENTH NINETEEN NINTH SEVEN SEVENTH THIRD THREE TWELVE These words below do not count in a Compatibility, a Union, nor in a Compatibility/Union Lexigram for them. These only apply to Lexigrams of them each as individuals. Unique to him; A E H II LL M N O S T W : MILLION MILLIONTH TEN TWO Unique to her; A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z: NINE To be continued...... ********************************************** Hello Eleanore and darkdreamer Yes I am very busy but will get back to this. Thank you both for your willingness to listen to my take on Lexigramming. It is appreciated. Hopefully I will have a link in the next few weeks or so illustrating this by using the names; quote: Romeo Montague Juliet Capulet
Which at first glance has interesting words to consider as relevant. ONLY in UNION, can they get this fateful line: quote: TRAGIC ROMANCE
Neither has it as individuals. Neither has it in common. And in Union or Compatibility, his NO does not affect their union, because she does not have it in her name alone to share with him having it. Nor is it exclusive to them as a Union because he has it as an individual. In a Compatibility, using only the words they both share, and or have as individuals, "tragic romance" does not appear. But as a couple, tragedy by way of the Lexigram is revealed. Any positive compatibility could not save them. **********************************************All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 01:33 AM
quote: Romeo Montague Juliet Capulet
Which at first glance has interesting words to consider as relevant. ONLY in UNION, can they get this fateful line: quote: TRAGIC ROMANCE
Neither has it as individuals. Neither has it in common. And in Union or Compatibility, his NO does not affect their union, because she does not have it in her name alone to share with him having it. Nor is it exclusive to them as a Union because he has it as an individual. In a Compatibility, using only the words they both share, and or have as individuals, "tragic romance" does not appear. But as a couple, tragedy by way of the Lexigram is revealed. Any positive compatibility could not save them. ********************************************** person's Lexigrams... Words they share in common[/b]=Compatibility:A ALONE I IN LIE LINE LONE LOW NEW NO NOW WE WON There are no Union words in the two Lexigrams. So to continue, I will illustrate using number related words valid to the 4 different types of Lexigrams. Examples of Single person/individual number words: Unique to him; A E H II LL M N O S T W : MILLION MILLIONTH TEN TWO Unique to her; A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z: NINE Examples of Compatability number words...words they share, and as individuals: ONE Examples of number words that can only be created by them together, not as in common nor as individuals...ie; only as a Union. ELEVEN ELEVENTH NINETEEN NINTH SEVEN SEVENTH THIRD THREE TWELVE By combining your Compatibility words with your Union words; you acquire words to use to create a Compatibility/Union Lexigram: ONE ELEVEN ELEVENTH NINETEEN NINTH SEVEN SEVENTH THIRD THREE TWELVE These words below do not count in a Compatibility, a Union, nor in a Compatibility/Union Lexigram for them. These only apply to Lexigrams of them each as individuals. Unique to him; A E H II LL M N O S T W : MILLION MILLIONTH TEN TWO Unique to her; A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z: NINE To be continued...... ********************************************** Hello Eleanore and darkdreamer Yes I am very busy but will get back to this. Thank you both for your willingness to listen to my take on Lexigramming. It is appreciated. Hopefully I will have a link in the next few weeks or so illustrating this by using the names; quote: Romeo Montague Juliet Capulet
Which at first glance has interesting words to consider as relevant. ONLY in UNION, can they get this fateful line: quote: TRAGIC ROMANCE
Neither has it as individuals. Neither has it in common. And in Union or Compatibility, his NO does not affect their union, because she does not have it in her name alone to share with him having it. Nor is it exclusive to them as a Union because he has it as an individual. In a Compatibility, using only the words they both share, and or have as individuals, "tragic romance" does not appear. But as a couple, tragedy by way of the Lexigram is revealed. Any positive compatibility could not save them. **********************************************All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~
IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 07:16 AM
Unmoved! ! quote: I resisted for some time, dating younger guys, because it was "not proper" or something, I can't rememeber why... Then I woke up one day and realised that I was being stupid.
Yeah, a couple ladies only a few years older than my beloved, turned him down because he was 5 to 10 years younger. More than a few were flabbergasted when we became a couple! All of a sudden then they were interested, but hee hee too late for them! quote: Look at you, for example. You have a husband, he is younger, and if you thought like me (back in the days), you wouldn't have had the opportunity to get to know him.
Like those other silly ladies thinking he was too young, them too old and afraid of what people might think! Ridiculous! quote: Besides... these young boys are hot, and surprisingly mature.
Hee hee, well I would not call a 28 year old at the time a boy to my 43 then. But yeah, I agree! But it must be more than looks or age, he must be mature minded and have a brain! Additionally it is not just the younger fellows who can be hot.... I know, and have known, plenty of "hot" older guys! MUCH older! There are several great threads concerning age differences and relationships. I will try to locate them if you wish! quote: It was good to know about you and you hubby's age difference. It just proves that people are people, and judging them with their age (amongst other things is soooooo useless, pointless.
Great attitude!MAG! quote: Hi FAYTE!! Oh yeah? 15 years older than your partner? Wow thats cool!! in my case things are in the opposite way!! hehe
There are a few Knowflakes involved happily in relationships where their partner be they male or female. have a large age gap between them. You may be interested in those threads I spoke of also! ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~
IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 06, 2007 11:01 AM
Life saver, you are fayte. Now I am going to try and understand this above.Ok... soo we do not look at this with individual letters in mind but with words as a whole, so this means that I would just have to combine the letters together and make up words that I couldn't make before both people's alphabets were combined, right? For example, with him and I, he has an "H" I don't. so if I add an "H" to my lexigram, and make words I couldn't make before, then i have created Union words. I have "v" that he doesn't have so the same could be done. So, any word that could not be formed when letters we not combined show the quality of characterisitic of the Union?? I have a weird thought process, fayte, so please be patient with me. I could be understanding you but I could just be wording things in my strange way. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 06, 2007 11:09 AM
So, if both parties have a NO in their individual lexigram, it then applies in the compatibility. And does it also apply to the Union Lex? Sorry for being thivk here, but I want to do it properly so that is why I am asking about anything I am unsure of. IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 01:20 PM
Ok to start with the last question. quote: So, if both parties have a NO in their individual lexigram, it then applies in the compatibility. And does it also apply to the Union Lex?
1. If you BOTH have NO as INDIVIDUALS... Then you also have NO in common, ie, a Compatibility. word. 2.NO would not be on a Union, but it would be on a Compatibility/Union and of course an Individual and a Compatibility alone. 3.Because you can BOTH get NO from your Individual names, and so have it in common, sharing it, a Compatibility, it does count. But as a couple you cannot create NO as a unique word that can ONLY be made from you two together, ie; a Union. 4.But a Compatibility/Union will have it. I hope I made sense! ********************************************** All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission.------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 02:41 PM
OK..... Now on to your previous questions. quote:
Ok... soo we do not look at this with individual letters in mind but with words as a whole, so this means that I would just have to combine the letters together and make up words that I couldn't make before both people's alphabets were combined, right?
Partially right, but there is more to it than that. I will clarify after your next question. quote: For example, with him and I, he has an "H" I don't. so if I add an "H" to my lexigram, and make words I couldn't make before, then i have created Union words. I have "v" that he doesn't have so the same could be done.
No. Some yes, some no. Let me try to explain. You add his "H" to your Letters....A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z +H Then consider his letters as they are.... A E H II LL M N O S T W When you simply ADD his "H" to your letters, You will acquire the following words; However; he will also have them as an individual, such as: INHALE AWHILE WHEAL WHINE WHALE OH WHOLE WHILE HALO HOWL WHEN HALE HI Those words would not be Union words because he has them as an individual. So even though borrowing his "H" would give them to you also; you do not have them from your original letters as an individual minus his "H". Some words that would be Union words would be: HEAVE HEAVEN WHIRLWIND VOCALIZATION HEARTS VINDICATION VANILLA VALENTINE VENERATION VAMPIRE VANISH THORN THRILL SWIVEL SAINTHOOD RADIANCE PREMONITION OMNIPRESENCE METEOROID Those words can only come from you two together, not as individuals nor as in common quote: So, any word that could not be formed when letters were not combined show the quality of characterisitic of the Union??
Not always as I have illustrated above and previously with the number related word examples.If either of you(not both, because both would make it a Compatibility word) can get it as an individual it is not a Union word. A Unique or individual word can only be found in one person's name not both. A Compatibility word can be found in both names as individuals. A Union word cannot be found in the either one as an individual, nor it found in common two people's names. A Union word can only be created from them together. quote: I have a weird thought process, fayte, so please be patient with me. I could be understanding you but I could just be wording things in my strange way.
You are fine by my reckoning! By the way..... You do get LOVES and LOVERS in a Union! And you have LOVE and LOVER as an individual. He does not have either as an individual, only you do. So as a Compatibility you do not share the words LOVE or LOVER, but as a Couple, a Union, you do together get the words LOVES and LOVERS. ********************************************** All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 06, 2007 04:24 PM
Now replying to your first post on this thread. quote: My Lexigram. And a guy's lexigram.Now, I have tried to do them and it got a little, no very, confusing especially in the union/compatibility/relationship part. Even with the individual ones, I couldn't decide which statement was true because of the word "no" present.
OK...first off I should clarify better a point. A "Relationship Lexigram" is composed of words you share in common/Compatibility, combined with Union words; words that can only be created from your names combined, and no other way. A Relationship Lexigram(Union/Compatibility) excludes the words you get as Unique individuals but do not have in common.The word NO you each have and so it becomes a Compatibility word. Remember, No can negate both bad and good, positive and negative. And as a couple/Union you would not create it. But as Single individuals sharing it, you do. You would each bring the word NO to the Relationship though because you both share the word NO. quote: Help before Venus Retro has me slitting my wrist, but you don't have to rush - when you get the time.
I do hope that was a joke! So on that note I shall quote myself: quote: Never base your important life decisions on any form of Divination, be it Lexigramming, Anagramming, Astrology, and so forth. These things can assist in your decisions, but ultimately one should make decisions based on logic and common sense.
OK...on to your questions.... quote: Me: A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W ZHim: A E H II LL M N O S T W If dates of birth give insight: me: 13/09/1982 him: 7/01/1985
Interesting! You have NINE alone in your name. You and he share the ONE And together you create the SEVEN. The 13 could be seen as a ONE and a THREE, THREE being a Union word. The 19 is NINETEEN, a UNION word. Or a ONE you both have with the NINE only you have. No 8 word though, or 5, but he has TWO alone. Hey I am just playing here with the numbers, do not know if it means anything. quote: Yeah, he is younger. Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher paved the way.
Hee hee...I guess I am showing my age. Actually Demi and Ashton are newbies on that scene! There have been many who paved that way! Timothy Bottoms and Susan Sarandon come to mind off the top of my head. quote: Thank you in advance.Unmoved.
Thank you for your interest! ********************************************** All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~
IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 07, 2007 03:17 PM
ThanksYeah, it was a joke... if I were to kill myself, bleeding to the end would not be the best way for me. Okay, I am actually with you here. I have been finding words that can only be formed only through the union of our individual letters, that can not be created alone, and I think we are going into polotics (puke!) Here they are if you're interested. Child Children Priest Certain Three Partner Severe Heaven Widow Widower Window Tension Nation NationalVote Voted Pension Western America American CitizensMeet Insane River Illinois Cheers Preordained Minister Licence Liaison Move Towards Indecisive Deepen Mislead Person Please Pleasant Cancer Capricorn Moon Son Relapse Related Worrisome Dote Steward Dawn Conceive Conception Panther Record Motion Movie Script Oscar Awards Oprah Television Novelist Writers Accomplished Sweet Level Paint Swoon Politics President Pretence Liars Sweden Oslo Poster Pillar Models I was trying to get a table on here but I couldn't. Anyway, so i just have to read over your "tutorial" until I get it because i have a tendency of confusing myself. Thanks love.
IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 07, 2007 03:24 PM
By the way fayte, you are being so helpful and you having little time was a blessing because there is no better to learn than to try it for oneself. I am very grateful for your time and effort, and most of all, patience. You're a star. Seriuosly. You know, when ever you feel that you have something to share as far as lexigrams are concerned, just put it on this thread. I will always check for anything you have to say, and share, and teach. Thank you. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 07, 2007 03:38 PM
One more thing.You mentioned that LOVES and LOVERS are in my individual as well as in our Union lex, so one can have a word in an Union Lex that is found in the Individual lex? I disregarded any word that can be found in our individual lexigrams because I thought it can not be included. Phew! This is more complicated than I thought. On the lighter side of things, i hope the numbers do not suggest the number of children we are going to have. I saw eleven. Scary. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 264 From: South Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted August 07, 2007 04:57 PM
Nevermind Fayte about the LOVES and LOVERS thing. I see now, i do not have "S" in my name.I get it! christ! One has to be really attentive to detail in lexigrams. IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 07, 2007 06:42 PM
I will work up replies to each of your posts asap! ********************************************* All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~
IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 07, 2007 11:45 PM
Please see notes below concerning the words you "found". I have highlighted ones you cannot aquire and put in upper case the ones that do not belong in a Union, and italicized the ones that have errors in spelling. Child Children Priest Certain Three Partner Severe Heaven Widow Widower Window Tension Nation National Vote Voted Pension Western America American Citizens Meet Insane River Illinois Cheers Preordained Minister Licence LIAISON Move Towards Indecisive Deepen Mislead Person Please Pleasant Cancer Capricorn Moon SON Relapse Related Worrisome Dote Steward DAWN Conceive Conception Panther Record Motion Movie Script Oscar Awards Oprah Television Novelist Writers Accomplished Sweet Level Paint Swoon Politics President Pretence Liars Sweden Oslo Poster Pillar Models You cannot get them from these letters: A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z A E H II LL M N O S T W the following words: Partner....it requires 2 of the letter R. River.......it requires 2 of the letter R. Preordained.....it requires 2 of the letter D and 2 of the letter R. Licence.....it requires 2 of the letter C.... .......it is also misspelled and should be License, which is in those letters. Cancer ....it requires 2 of the letter C. Capricorn.....it requires 2 of the letter C. Worrisome ....it requires 2 of the letter R. Conceive...it requires 2 of the letter C. Conception ....it requires 2 of the letter C. Record....it requires 2 of the letter R. Writers....it requires 2 of the letter R. Accomplished ....it requires 2 of the letter C. Pretence is misspelled and should be Pretense, which is in those letters. Dawn can be found in A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z
Liaison and Son can be found in A E H II LL M N O S T W So those are only individual words you do have as individuals only, not as a Compatibility nor as a Union. Which leaves the following words which are Union words.: Child Children Priest Certain Three Severe Heaven Widow Widower Window Tension Nation National Vote Voted Pension Western America American Citizens Meet Insane Illinois Cheers Minister Move Towards Indecisive Deepen Mislead Person Please Pleasant Moon Relapse Related Dote Steward Panther Motion Movie Script Oscar Awards Oprah Television Novelist Sweet Level Paint Swoon Politics President Liars Sweden Oslo Poster Pillar Models Licence should be spelled as License. As the "misspelled" version you could not have it, because it has 2 of the letter C. Presence should be spelled as Pretense. Both words can only be created from both names together, which makes them be Union words. A C D EE I L NNN OO P R V W Z A E H II LL M N O S T W ********************************************** All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~
IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 08, 2007 12:05 AM
Bless you Unmoved! quote: By the way fayte, you are being so helpful and you having little time was a blessing because there is no better to learn than to try it for oneself.I am very grateful for your time and effort, and most of all, patience. You're a star. Seriuosly. You know, when ever you feel that you have something to share as far as lexigrams are concerned, just put it on this thread. I will always check for anything you have to say, and share, and teach. Thank you.
Thank you for your sincere interest! I shall as soon as I can, post a few links showing Lexigram examples and more of our research.
------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 08, 2007 12:21 AM
quote: Phew! This is more complicated than I thought.
Indeed it is! And I have been at it for over 4 decades to date! quote: On the lighter side of things, i hope the numbers do not suggest the number of children we are going to have. I saw eleven. Scary.
You need not be afraid of the numbers! On a Compatibility angle you have ONE, suggesting that is the best for you both to get along with. However in order of numerical value, as a Union, you acquire the following numbers: THREE THIRD SEVEN SEVENTH NINTH ELEVEN ELEVENTH TWELVE NINETEEN Perhaps you shall have 3 children! One born the 3rd. day or month. One born the 7th day or month. One born the 9th. day or month. And based on your Compatibility ONE, perhaps only one child, taking ELEVEN=11 as two ones, one born on the 11th. day or month. Or twins....One pregnancy, two babies. Or in the case of twins...one born on the 11th. day in the 11th. month and the second born on the 12th. day of the 11th. month using the TWELVE=12. One twin born just before midnight, and the second twin born just after midnight on different days in the same month! ********************************************** All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission.
IP: Logged |
fayte.m Knowflake Posts: 8575 From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted August 08, 2007 12:39 AM
quote: Nevermind Fayte about the LOVES and LOVERS thing. I see now, i do not have "S" in my name.I get it!
Glad you got it figured out at last! You do have LOVE and LOVER in yours alone. He has neither as he has no letter V. But in Union you get with his S and your Lover and Love, (which you do not have in a Union, only as an individual, just as he only has the S) but you aquire by a Union LOVERS and LOVES! quote: christ! One has to be really attentive to detail in lexigrams.
I will post some even more interesting things asap! I gets even more complicated, and more fun and interesting! ********************************************* All specific terminology and information herein posted by myself on this site concerning Lexigrams/Lexigramming, and the research into the Science and Art of Lexigrams/Lexigramming is under the Copyright © of Intrinsic Development and used by permission. ------------------ "Heaven doesn't want me and Hell is afraid I'll take over and start a rehab for the damned!" ~Judgement Must Be Balanced With Compassion~ ~Do Not Seek Wealth From The Suffering, Or The Dire Needs Of Others~ ~Assumption Is The Bane Of Understanding~ ~ if you keep doing what you did, you'll keep getting what you got.~ }><}}}(*> <*){{{><{ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ IP: Logged | |