|
Author
|
Topic: Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton
|
lotusheartone
Knowflake Posts: 190
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008
|
posted March 26, 2008 04:13 PM
 
Good for you, Fayte-LEXX!LOve to ALL. ... IP: Logged |
Ra
Moderator Posts: 2078
From: Atlanta
Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted March 27, 2008 04:24 AM
You don't miss a thing, do you Lexx.  The "unintended" words have been corrected, I think. Feel free to critique and correct the lexi as you feel the need. I think sometimes the Word Druids allow us to make small "mistakes" for the sake of relaying a bit of intuitive or subconscious material in a way which flows more smoothly, especially with words so small as 'IS', which I only used twice. In my opinion, a list of computer generated words, which I've noticed you (Lexx) use quite frequently, and while no doubt very helpful, can short-circuit the intuitive process, sometimes. What do you think? Anyway, once this lexi got going, I didn't think it was going to stop. There was a lot more that could have been written, but I had to end it somewhere!  What is written here is an abbreviated version. I guess with that many letters, one can come up with just about any version one wishes to. I can't recall Linda's rule on the number of letters allowed ... what is it? I get the impression that Hillary is truly a wicked person, but that she will also, unfortunately, be our next President.   IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 11:14 AM
Thank you Ra.
quote:
I think sometimes the Word Druids allow us to make small "mistakes" for the sake of relaying a bit of intuitive or subconscious material in a way which flows more smoothly, especially with words so small as 'IS', which I only used twice. In my opinion, a list of computer generated words, which I've noticed you (Lexx) use quite frequently, and while no doubt very helpful, can short-circuit the intuitive process, sometimes. What do you think?
You do quite well and do not add long words like many do.
Ok...now for a rant....
However until my ocular stroke I rarely used any computer generated words. I still do not rely on such even though my eyesight is a mess. I can no longer search dictionaries by hand as easily as before. I still do most of my Lexigramming by hand contrary to popular perception. It was not just my ocular stroke in August 2007 which prompted my husband to give me my own computerized search function because of my damaged eyesight...it was all the people accusing me of using a computer to do my lexigramming before that, which I was not doing. And even now most of the time they still are hand done from my mind. The anagram generators nearly everyone else uses have far more helps than my dictionary search tool, which does what I used to do by hand. So I was being accused of using a program long before I ever did use one, and my husband said, " I will make you a program to help you now because of your stroke, and because "they" will never believe you did/do them by hand anyhow".
So after having done Lexigramming for over 40 years by hand and reading dictionaries for pleasure up until the stroke of August 2007, I did not need a dictionary "reader" to help me. As for straight word lists, they are available to all. The guy with the banner uses this one to find anagrams to string together. www.wordsmith.org/
Several other so called charging professional do the same thing and or download and use the many free anagram/wordlist generator software programs out there.
Something I do not do.
Your Lexigrams and a few others here are pretty good and rarely have errors. But most here do have high error rates, many with excesses of up to 29 added words in one Lexigram for example. Six to 12 added, most hidden, words is not uncommon. And I am not talking about the simple addition of "a" or "and" or "the" and so forth! Added words I have seen are for example:
GENUINE, RELATION, STARS, GODDESS,
THUNDERING, PASSIONS, STRANGER, TRUTH, ABILITIES, MISSIONS, DEMONIC, INSIDE, SOULMATES, VISIONS, BEGUILING, ROMANCE,
DENIED, INSPIRED, INSIPID, REVERSE....and the list goes on. These additions, usually hidden, do change what a Lexigram has to reveal. And folks keep using the so called word druids as an excuse to keep adding words not allowed willy nilly. If they are in tune with some entities such as the word druids,...then the word druids are giving them faulty advice and inspiring heavy cheating when creating faux Lexigrams. I have seen Lexigrams with 60+ errors being touted as "wonderful amazing!"
I am tired of folks resenting my Lexigramming and being jealous and previously accusing me of using a generator to do them. I still do most by hand. That is why they are short. I do not do long error laden ones with many long added words to try to look all mystical.
Lexigramming is not easy for me since having a few strokes.
IF I WERE USING A GENERATOR, DON'T YOU OR ANYONE THINK I WOULD BE CHURNING DOZENS OUT EVERY DAY?
OF COURSE I WOULD!
I am not yelling at you Ra, but people in general.
I was being given grief over my Lexigrams long before I begain pointing out errors to some. It has virtually nothing to do with not doing them Linda's way. Many folks here have
and do bend Linda's rules every which way to suit them. Why it is not noticed I have no idea. I on the other hand have been honest and stated what I do and how, and get razzed about it.
Rant over.
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 11:27 AM
Ra you said: quote:
I guess with that many letters, one can come up with just about any version one wishes to.
That is a gross misconception I am endeavoring to dispel!
Even with the names etcetera which break Linda's rules, Lexigramming long names etcetera is still not easy and the missing letters will not allow most every word to be used. The one on Hillary sure could have used many more needed letters! It took me several hours to do that one and the other one without adding letters!
I dare anyone to try to do their versions of the following without adding words or letters not found from the sources.
LOVE SIGNSGoldilocks and the Three Bears Sixteenth President, Abraham Lincoln
Napoleone di Buonaparte The First Thirty-Eighth President, Gerald Rudolph Ford, Junior PS.It is that adding of LONG BIG WORDS I illustrated above that will "give a person most any word"....whereupon they can add as they desire, any word not found therein, to "force" a so called Lexigram "to say things they want" not what is actually there. That adding of such not allowed words also illustrates why they add words.."because one CANNOT GET MOST EVERY WORD"...and so they feel impelled to add not allowed words. If anyone could get most or all the words in a dictionary from long names etcetera, then one would logically have no longer have a perceived need to ADD WORDS/letters now would they? Your version on Hillary has less to do with the number of words found, but on your own feelings and opinions of her.
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 12:04 PM
Thank you Lotus quote:
Good for you, Fayte-LEXX!
As I said.....
I shall show as best I can, good and bad as it appears in names, whether I like the person(s) or not.
Honest Lexigramming does not go out of its way to show things in a good or bad light. To be honest in Lexigramming is to allow what is there to come forth and reveal itself whether we like what is revealed or not!
Lotusheartone....
I still like the positive Anagrams of your user name
LOTUSHEARTONE=
SOUL ON A TETHER
OH SOUL ENTREAT
OUST NOT HEALER
TO HEARTEN SOUL
THOU SO ETERNAL
TO EARTHEN SOUL
HEREON OUTLAST
TOLERANT HOUSE
ALSO THEREUNTO
PS.
Have not checked for errors yet.IP: Logged |
Ra
Moderator Posts: 2078
From: Atlanta
Registered: Jun 2005
|
posted March 27, 2008 01:16 PM
I think thou protesteth too louldy.IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 01:43 PM
Hello again Ra
quote:
In my opinion, a list of computer generated words, which I've noticed you (Lexx) use quite frequently,
Again just how do you ascertain if and how often I avail myself of such? As I said, until last August I had no need for such. quote:
and while no doubt very helpful, can short-circuit the intuitive process, sometimes. What do you think?
Actually I do not find such helpful unless struggling to find a synonym for a word not found in what is being Lexigrammed that will fit and can be found. And even then it is so very much quicker for example to just look up the synonym in a paper dictionary or an online one (where the font size can be enlarged at the touch of a key to assist ones with visual handicaps such as mine. So I usually avoid losts and go look up a synonym MANUALLY and do not relp on word lists. And as for word lists, one can look at such and still be unable to come up with anything easily. It still requires intuition and filters to allow the true magic of Lexigrammming to come forth, letting one's mind wait to see what words "RISE UP TO THE FORE" to be used in creating the Lexigram.
Just using a list will not create a Lexigram nor make it automatically easier. In fact it can complicate things at times. Use a list to double check if a word is actually there, and use a synonym find feature in a hard copy dictionary or an electronic one to find a word you want to use with the same meaning if the one you want cannot be used.
And if your vocabulary is extensive, then you need to usually rely only on your own internal mental synonym finder in your own mind. But as we all can see, folks do instead cheat and add words because they do not have the synonym stored in their brain vocabulary indexes/dictionaries. A little more attention and ethics in Lexigramming would be to not be so vain as to pridefully avoid a dictionary, and adding words not actually from the word being Lexigrammed. That little bit of effort does not impinge upon the magic nor the does it short circuit the intuition process. Nor does using a list unless one is totally relying on one which in my opinion is ridiculous and time consuming and often ponderous. But as a way to check if a word is there when free associating and intuiting, once done Lexigramming..yes it can assist in double checking. And again, using a synonym finder is an easier way to find a similar word....then make sure you can use one of the synonyms. If there are none the do not add such a word.
Suffice it to say, both you and others have the wrong udeas about how I go about Lexigramming it seems and think I have some miracle program that does it all for me. Well
I sure as heck wish I did but I do not.You all assume far too much.
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 01:47 PM
quote:
I think thou protesteth too louldy.
Yes I certainly do protest loudly.  
But not too loudly. I feel my reasons have merit and my arguments valid. Assumptions have been made which are untrue or warped. Just clearing the air and clarifying. And should I simply sit back and say nothing and watch the assumptions and misconceptions to continue? What sense would that action make? I do not think perhaps I havbe been loud enough because I keep getting hit up for much the same over and over.
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 02:29 PM
Hello again Ra
quote:
You don't miss a thing, do you Lexx.The "unintended" words have been corrected, I think. Feel free to critique and correct the lexi as you feel the need.
DEMOCRA(c)Y IS THE ONLY ADDED WORD LEFT.As for the small words being added...I do not do that but if ones wish to do so, no problem, I simply do not then consider it a true Lexigram in the strictest sense of the definition of a Lexigram; and small is the operative word here, not the adding of words which can and do radically change the true meaning of the resulting "lexigram" such as:
GENUINE, RELATION, STARS,
GODDESS,THUNDERING, PASSIONS,
STRANGER, TRUTH, ABILITIES,
MISSIONS, DEMONIC, INSIDE,
SOULMATES, VISIONS, BEGUILING,
ROMANCE,DENIED, INSPIRED, INSIPID,
REVERSE, LOVERS....
which are the type of words too many folks freely add, not the little words such as:
A AN AS I AM AND......
And you spelled ANNIHILATE as ANIHILATE.
You have enough "N"s to spell it correctly. IP: Logged |
lotusheartone
Knowflake Posts: 190
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 03:22 PM
Thanks for doing a lexigram of my name,
even though I did not ask you to..Just like people do not ask you to correct
their lexigrams.. or to point out every spelling error... I can't imagine what it must be like!? Can you imagine someone on here, correcting
peoples spelling errors...all the time!? gotta be an ego thing!? or obsession, or control, who knows! I still find it rude! LOve to ALL. ... IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 03:40 PM
quote:
Thanks for doing a lexigram of my name,
even though I did not ask you to..
Lotus you did ask years ago...which is when those ANAGRAMS, not Lexigrams were done for you, but then we fought, so I never posted them all here until now. Now you thank me yet insult my doing them.  quote:
Just like people do not ask you to correct
their lexigrams..
This is a PUBLIC FORUM. I made my points very clear as to why I take accuracy in Lexigramming very seriously and many have and do appreciate my help. I do not see why it is considered an awful thing. PLEASE POINT OUT MISTAKES IN MY LEXIGRAMS! If you see added letters or words..I would be very appreciative if you would be so kind as to point them out so I can fix my errors!
Thank you!
quote:
or to point out every spelling error...
Again, when it comes to Lexigramming, why not? quote:
I can't imagine what it must be like!?Can you imagine someone on here, correcting
peoples spelling errors...all the time!?
I am only concerned with it when it comes to Lexigramming. quote:
gotta be an ego thing!?or obsession, or control, who knows!
No, none of that. Just want accuracy when it comes to Lexigrams! To me it is like a Doctor not clearly writing out a prescription and the pharmacist then giving me the wrong medicine!
I feel the same way about Lexigramming which should be as accurate at least word wise as possible!
quote:
I still find it rude!
Why?PS. I wast at least kind and did not post the ugly Anagrams of your user name. IP: Logged |
lotusheartone
Knowflake Posts: 190
From: MOther & Father GOd
Registered: Feb 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 03:53 PM
A teacher
must master oneS-elf..
otherwise
teacher
becomes cheater..until you can see the error in your own ways..
then go on as usual..things will not change..
I am surprised that in your last post..you did not bring up all your problems, because usually you do, it usually all turns around, and ends up being about you... you said, I asked you to do a lexigram of my name a few years ago, what does that have to do with today, did I ask you recently? It's a public forum, so do what you want! LOve to ALL. ... IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 05:45 PM
IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 25205
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted March 27, 2008 07:50 PM
Great Lexigram, Ra!------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia." Charles Schultz IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 08:17 PM
I agree Randall 
Makes one wonder if indeed past lives etcetera can be glimpsed through a Lexigram.
I am going to take another look and see what jumps out at me when not viewing her as a candidate and former first lady.Thanks for the food for thought Ra. 
IP: Logged |
zanya
Knowflake Posts: 654
From:
Registered: Oct 2007
|
posted March 27, 2008 08:48 PM
so the new world order will be under the auspices of Isis? is that what makes Hillary demonic?LG has only good things to say about Isis, including in her lexigrams on Isis, Osiris and Horus...in their capacity of saving the world, rather than enslaving it...it would seem. IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat......... fayte1954@hotmail.com LEXIGRAMMING
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 27, 2008 09:30 PM
___________________________________________
ok that is just a quickie...needs work..
but I find many Mantic Arts words in her name when manually consulting "Bletzer". Wild!
BTW.....
Oneiromancy is a form of divination based upon dreams; it is a system of dream interpretation that uses dreams to predict the future. PS. To all who think I have some mysteriuos secret program to automatically create my Lexigrams.......
Wrong!
I just had to correct the above several times after posting!
I had the word dreamer, and a few letters like "S" in it. I make many mistakes but go over and over it until I find the errors. My Alphabet Challenge one had 22 errors I did not discover until after I posted it!
I really want my errors pointed out to me! How can I fix them if I miss them?
One error sat for months before Zala caught it and was kind enough to tell me!
PPS. I found more mistakes! Misspelled myrrh and anointed. I fixed them all this time I hope. IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
