|
Author
|
Topic: It's ABORTION, not ABORTIONS
|
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 22, 2008 10:34 PM
  
LEXX  Pumpkin Peace  I personally don't believe in the "word druids" thing. I agree with LEXX- I would lexigram all the letters I have at hand, adding no more, omitting no less. The resulting lexgrams are the fruit of our intuitive knowledge, not "led" by some word druids, to me, that's nonsense. Linda made quite a lot of mistakes in her lexigrams in "Star Signs"- especially the ones from MARY MAGDALENE. D IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 22, 2008 11:25 PM
D for Defiant! 
Thank you!
I feel to unveil/reveal the truth in Lexigrams we must endeavour to use only the letters that can be found in the source we are Lexigramming.
Like I said...I wonder if Linda was led astray because it was not time to find the keys and use them.
Yes...she made many errors in her Lexigrams. Did she realize that or not? I mean her absolutely no disrespect but why the errors?
Why are they not corrected?
I have corrected all of them and posted two here and mentioned others.
If no one will go at me...I would love to point out the discrepancies and why they were left.
Most folks have not noticed them or are afraid to speak of it and allow the opportunity to ask questions and learn from it all.
I dream many of my Lexigrams and or go into deep immersion trance. If I am inspired they write themselves.
Happy Lexigramming!
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 23, 2008 10:04 PM
LEXX  We need someone like you to point out our discrepancies! I'm with you. Again, as far as I'm concerned, any attempt to omit or add letters to the original entity being lexigrammed or any excuse such as "word druids" would simply be the distortion of the original lexigrams, hence the distortion of the truth! Keep up the great work, folks!!! D IP: Logged |
Pumpkin Peace
unregistered
|
posted November 23, 2008 10:34 PM
WHAT ARE THE WORD DRUIDS FOR?THE WORD DRUIDS STIR WEIRD ROWS (arguments) THE WORD DRUIDS ARE WEIRD...
THE WORD DRUIDS TEAR WORDS THAT OTHERS READ
THE WORD DRUIDS THROW DUDS
THE TRUTH THE WORD DRUIDS SHOW IS DISTORTED
THE WORD DRUIDS USE WORDS AS A SWORD OR A ROD TO HIT OTHERS' HEADS WITH
THE WORD DRUIDS FEAR US, SO ORDER THE WORD DRUIDS OUT OF HEADS. ...Now that doesn't sound very nice. There may be a positive side to it, but I didn't find it here.
Oh well, that answer is good enough for me. Personally, I've always been wary of any sort of 'spirit guide', as they do have minds of their own, and not always the best intentions. Lexigramming is fun! (random outburst.. lol) Love To All! IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 23, 2008 11:17 PM
Very good Pumpkin Peace!:
One I did awhile back.
I need to redo it.~WORD DRUIDS~ DO US OR WORD DRUIDS DO WORDS?
OUR WORDS OURS, OR WORD DRUIDS' WORDS? IS WORD DRUID OURS,
OR IS WORD DRUID US? SO IS WORD DRUID OUR ID?
DID DRUIDS OR...
DID US DO WORDS, ODD WORDS? I DID WORDS..
I DO ODD WORDS. SO.....
IS DUO ID I, OR US?
OR IS OUR ID,
OUR WORD DRUIDS? SO....
ODD WORD DRUIDS, OR US? IS;
DI, DODI, DORI, DORIS, DORRIS, DOW, DUD,
ODIS, ORI, RID, RO, ROI, ROD, RODI, RORI.
ROS, ROW, SI, SID, URI, DIO, IDO, RUSO..... US, OUR ID, OR OUR WORD DRUIDS? SO DO OUR SORDID WORD ROWS,
OUR WORD SWORD SOUR,
RID US OUR ID,
OR DO ODD WORD DRUIDS
RID US OUR ID,
RID US OUR WORDS? WORDS OURS?
OR WORD DRUIDS' WORDS? DO OUR ID OR WORD DRUIDS
SOW US OUR WORDS? I SOW ODD WORDS.
I DO WORDS.
I DID WORD ODDS. SO....
WORD DRUIDS OR US...
DO OUR WORDS,
SOW US OUR WORDS? US!!!!!!!!!!
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain.
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 12:19 AM
quote:
LEXX We need someone like you to point out our discrepancies! I'm with you. Again, as far as I'm concerned, any attempt to omit or add letters to the original entity being lexigrammed or any excuse such as "word druids" would simply be the distortion of the original lexigrams, hence the distortion of the truth!
Thanks D for Defiant!
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 07:48 AM
Pumpkin Peace  quote:
Oh well, that answer is good enough for me. Personally, I've always been wary of any sort of 'spirit guide', as they do have minds of their own, and not always the best intentions.
I think the w.d.s are like Flow/Flo. 
A few years back my husband and I talked of going with the flow or listening to flow. Well the flow begain giving some very odd advice, most trite and not very helpful. Well one thing led to another and we discovered when we called on "flow" that it was actually a wanting to be helpful but silly spirit of an old lady named "Flo/Florence" who was answering us. Neighbors confirmed that a nice but busy body old lady named Florence had indeed died in the house next to us years back. 
She meant well but was not "the flow".
Always make sure who it is guiding, or what.
I think it more likely the w.d.s are a bunch of old ladies too, who loved word games during the 19th. century spiritualist movement. Trying to communicate with some vague thing called "spirit" or photographing fairies and so forth was a much hyped thing in those times. They may have even been reincarnated Celtic druids....but not any sprite or nature spirit or whatever guarding the English language. I submit..what on Earth would a nature spirit care about words or why? Words are NOT their thing to care about! I also surmise one or more were once an English teacher or librarian, or a lover of crossword puzzles and so forth.
Just my theory.
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain.
IP: Logged |
Pumpkin Peace
unregistered
|
posted November 24, 2008 01:14 PM
Very interesting theory! Words are indeed a very physical thing, and spirits don't need them to communicate. And why should such an important truth need to be 'guarded'? If they were afraid of humans abusing it, well, they're already abusing their limited knowledge of words, so guarding the truth isn't proving very useful, is it?
Anyway, the Age of Aquarius is upon us, and the truth can't stay hidden for long. Those 'spirits' or 19th century old ladies, or whatever, will have to go.  IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 01:38 PM
Here are some links to a site which explains the development of language and writing. Writing
The history, development and evolution of the world's writing systems
*************************************
The Origin and History
of the
English Language
Scroll down for the family tree of languages. English is not only a newcomer relatively speaking but is also a hodge podge of words borrowed from many other languages ancient and modern. Why Linda used the word "druids" for her muses is odd. Druids were of the Proto-Celtic culture and later Celtic..NOT the Anglo/English culture. quote:
Proto-Celtic is an Indo-European language of the Centum group, possibly via a common Italo-Celtic stage or Sprachbund. The area in which the language seems to have first become distinguishably Proto-Celtic may correspond to the Hallstatt culture, on the western fringes of the Urnfield in the early 1st millennium BC
That makes Celtic/Druidic language and writing far newer than the ancient spoken and written languages of Ancient Ur and or Sumner which are thought to be the site of what legend refers to the "Tower Of Babel"...
a ziggarat. quote:
Ziggurats were built by the Sumerians, Babylonians, Elamites and Assyrians of ancient Mesopotamia as monuments to local religions. The earliest examples of the ziggurat were simple raised platforms that date from the Ubaid period[1] during the fourth millennium BC
quote:
When and Where Did English Begin?
When and Where Did English Begin?
The quick answer
A brief but accurate answer to this would be “very roughly 1500 years ago, give or take a century or so, on the Eastern side of the island of Great Britain — in what we now call the East and South-East of England (but nobody called it ‘England’ then)”.Perhaps this is too vague for you — you would like a date? As a respectable academic, I ought to say this is as precise as we can be. But if you press me — all right, then: in a symbolic sense, at any rate, perhaps we might say that English began in A.D. 449, at a place called Ebbsfleet on Pegwell Bay, near Ramsgate in Kent. I cannot give you a specific birthday, but it will have been in the summer rather than winter half of the year.
As one can see...other languages, alphabets, and writing predate English by many thousands of years. The Phoenicians are credited with developing the world's first alphabet, which was then modified by the addition of vowels, by the Greeks, whose first two letters, alpha and beta -- drawn from the first two (consonantal) letters of the Hebrew alphabet -- were put together to form the name "alphabet." See this link!
The Phoenician Alphabet
The Ancient World's First Widely Used Form of Written Communication
quote:
The cuneiform script (pronounced /kjuːˈniːɨfɔrm/ kew-NEE-i-form) is one of the earliest known forms of written expression. Emerging in Sumer around the 30th century BC, with predecessors reaching into the late 4th millennium (the Uruk IV period),
That is roughly 3,000 to 4,000 BCE. quote:
cuneiform writing began as a system of pictographs. In the course of the 3rd millennium BC the pictorial representations became simplified and more abstract. The number of characters in use also grew gradually less, from about 1,000 unique characters in the Early Bronze Age to about 400 unique characters in Late Bronze Age Hittite cuneiform. Cuneiform writing was gradually replaced by alphabetic writing in the Iron Age Neo-Assyrian Empire and was practically extinct by the beginning of the Common Era. It was deciphered from scratch in 19th century scholarship.
Cuniform script
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain.IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 02:44 PM
For fun see:
Write Like a Babyloniansee your monogram in cuneiform,
the way an ancient Babylonian might have written it. ------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 10:26 PM
Pumpkin Peace,I am very impressed with your W.D. related lexis! D IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 24, 2008 10:34 PM
And of course, not all spirits are nice. Some of them are malevolent and might trick you. I agree on the idea that lexigramming and guidance from spirits don't match. Just be aware when communicating with spirits, they are not always kind and honest. D IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 25, 2008 06:27 PM
quote:
I agree on the idea that lexigramming and guidance from spirits don't match
Generally no they do not. However I do channeled and or deep immersion trance state Lexigramming too. I ALWAYS check the results for errors! With rare exception...there are usually one or more errors to be fixed.------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 29, 2008 09:28 PM
I am repeating myself, but "Entity Possession" by Samuel Sagan, M.D. gives a refreshing insight on women's astral vulnerabilities when having an abortion or a miscarriage:Clairvision School The Inner Space Interactive Sourcing, aka ISIS technique, developed by Dr Sagan, maintains the client's acute consciousness while the facilitator/connector administers ISIS, explores and heals samskara and other issues concerning the astral body. And a great deal more. D IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted November 30, 2008 12:21 AM
Interesting.
I shall see if I can get it from the library.
In general I feel that actual possession is rare.
In my experience it is more often an overlaying, or a past life coming to fore, or a soul fracture.
Such can indeed cause emotional troubles.
As for miscarriages/still births...it can I theorize be the soul of the mother recognizing a soul has come in too early, something only walk ins or malicious souls do...taking over before the soul the foetal body was meant for can move in at 12 weeks.
The miscarriage rate is from 25% to 33% before 12 weeks, often with the woman not even realizing she is even pregnant. Miscarriage after 12 weeks is much rarer.
This is one of the topics in one of the books my husband and I are working on, so apologies, I do not want to get into more details here.
We have been working on it on and off between other writing projects for several years to date.
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 22, 2008 10:44 PM
quote:
Now for another lexigram...ARE ABORTIONS NATURAL?
I am neither a native speaker of English nor a linguist, but as I had pointed out earlier, people tend to use the singular form, rather than the plural form of the word ABORTION when mentioning it in conversations. I personally think individuals are more likely to ask "IS ABORTION NATURAL?" instead of "ARE ABORTIONS NATURAL?" since they usually say, as the examples I had given- "I AM AGAINST ABORTION" instead of "I AM AGAINST ABORTIONS"; "ABORTION SHOULD BE MADE LEGAL" instead of "ABORTIONS SHOULD BE MAKE LEGAL"; "ABORTION IS AGAINST THE LAW IN THIS COUNTRY" instead of "ABORTIONS ARE AGAINST THE LAW IN THIS COUNTRY" etc. D
IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 23, 2008 01:10 PM
------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 15, 2009 12:41 AM
DfD
I was reading through this thread and wanted to quote you because it has been something I have been pondering too as I am reading the Lexigramming sections in Star Signs for like over the 25th. time or so.
quote:
We talk about the legality of ABORTION as the action taken, we speak of our personal beliefs regarding ABORTION as the action taken, not as multiple incidents. Thus I personally think we should use ABORTION when lexigramming, instead of the recommended plural form ABORTIONS in Linda's "Star Signs". The same can be applied to other similar cases: I'd say "I don't like psychiatric hospitalization" as the action taken by individuals rather than "I don't like psychiatric hospitalizations" as separate incidents.ABORTION "IT IS NOT A SIN" cannot be found in its lexigram. Neither can "IT IS A ROBOT". I am not indicating ABORTION is a sin, as I am not as judgmental as I used to be anymore, but I just mean I am not saying there is absolutely nothing wrong with ABORTION, either. D
WOW!That does make a radical difference doesn't it?
ABORTION or ABORTIONS.
When a woman gets an abortion, you are correct....it is one abortion to abort the
the child within her womb (or children), but it is indeed abortion...IT IS NOT abortionS.
Wow!
That totally blows out the rationale for the idea that Lexigrammatically it is OK to abort! 
I shall return to comment more on this.
Thanks DfD for such a revelation! ------------------
Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain. IP: Logged |
D for Defiant
Knowflake Posts: 590
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2009 08:34 PM
Thank you.I do appreciate your very positive feedback.D IP: Logged |
LEXX
Knowflake Posts: 9742
From: Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.......& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted March 02, 2009 11:00 PM
IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
